Tuesday, December 16, 2014
Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11
I think that Michael Moore's documentary was extremely slanted and it is clear that the whole documentary is to make George Bush look bad. Moore continuously shows many times of Bush staring in space to make Bush seem like he has no idea what to do. Also Moore uses other techniques, for example voicing over interviews with Bush and putting his opinion in the documentary instead of the actual interviews. From the Spinsanity review of the amount of actual facts within the documentary, the writer looked into a Late Show with David Letterman episode in which Michael Moore claims "You can't refute what's said in the film. It's all there, the facts are all there, the footage is all there." The author then goes onto say that "Sadly, as with most of Moore's work, this is simply not true." The author then goes on to prove many points brought up in the film inaccurate.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think the documentary was made to try to uncover the truth about Bush and 9/11. I also believe when Bush was staring into space he didn't know what to do. To me there was also a lot of stuff that was and still is hidden from the public about 9/11. Finally the Bushes family was very much involved with the Binladin family and that's strange.
ReplyDelete